berkeley
Search Members
Type in a member you wish to find
Most Active Members
Most Recent Groups
In the News
My Profile:
berkeley
the propeller community is starting to breathe again, much to our relief. we are not out of the woods yet, nor are we quite into the woods, ala broadway, but somewhere in between. things are looking up.
Me, Elsewhere
Groups View All (15) »
Recent Activity View All (3091) »
-
04:05 AM
berkeley joined the group Searchbeam's Group
-
03:42 AM
berkeley submits article Sarah Palin: What Exactly Does The VP Do Everyday?
-
02:20 AM
berkeley props article Comcast: Metered Usage, But Where's the Meter?
- 02:20 AM
-
02:20 AM
berkeley props article Water Corruption Prevents Progress
-
02:20 AM
berkeley props article Ancient gold treasure puzzles Greek archaeologists
-
02:19 AM
berkeley props article Three Words
- 02:18 AM
-
02:18 AM
berkeley props article UK Faces Worst Economic Crisis in 60 Years
-
02:17 AM
berkeley comments on article John McCain Only Met Sarah Palin Once!
Talkin’ to berkeley View All (5) »

gamahuche1 month ago
Hey - are you the "boss" of the "old propeller community" group? Or cam you tell me who is? I'd definitely like to be aboard!

ind061 month ago
(2) AOL thinks that by stripping the site of features they are saving server space and thus saving money. Which also doesn't make any sense. (3) AOL is now featuring stories from Propeller on AOL news, one of my posts was featured and got almost 4,000 "reads" which is very attractive to blog owners. Never mind that that same post only got 70 or so votes when my normal average is about 120. This points to a fundamental restructuring of what Propeller exists for and it is NOT to support a community. Community means storage space and that means renting space on someone else's servers or buying servers of their own so if Propeller 2.0 exists as a "story farm" for AOL News it's possible that the less community there is the better. -As I said, just ruminations, and ones leaning a bit to the paranoid perhaps, but this is SO user UN-friendly you just have to wonder.

ind061 month ago
berkeley, that is the most articulate assessment of what's wrong with Prop 2.0 I've yet read. I believe the only thing you left out was page numbers and the edit feature. But really, with so much missing, it's hard to keep track. Of course, it remains to be seen if they respond, or if they do, how quickly. I hope JamesMarcus and Tom realize that an IMMEDIATE response to these concerns is an absolute requirement. At the very least friends' submissions should be returned within the week. Unbelievable that this was removed when members and scouts both lauded it as a fantastic feature. I also find the question of Beta testing perplexing. I have to believe they didn't do any, because if they did this ill-considered mess would not be here. But WHY? WHY would you not do Beta testing? Isn't that, like, a standard industry practice? Anyway, it was an excellent write up and they do insist they're listening...



