Arming the Middle East »
Posted by: populist 7 months, 1 week agoArms control analysts have consistently argued that the Middle East is too militarized already and the recipient governments already possess military capabilities well in excess of their legitimate security needs. Yet President Bush is effectively insisting that this volatile region does not yet have enough armaments, and the United States must sen
Read Full Story at antiwar.com
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 5
-

Mutainia7 months, 1 week ago
-

Locky127 months, 1 week ago
-
-

Gransater7 months, 1 week ago
Myself, I wonder if the blue turban that Nostradamus saw, in reality may not be the blue suit that the great decider likes to wear.
Scary.
Reply -

Teech7 months, 1 week ago
Too many weapons in the Middle East? Naaaaahhhhh.
That's why the Great Decider has it so we pay three times as much for Saudi Arabian oil while he sells them our latest weaponry at bargain basement prices.
Clever businessman, that Dumbya. Hell, the national debt is only 10 trillion. It's called "charge-a-war" and divide up the U.S. treasury among your rich pals.
Reply
Submitted By:
populistThe essays we offer are unapologetically presented for you to read & analyze. Many are offered as a similar view to ours & others simply to invite ...
Also submitted:
- 1.0 - Antiwar Radio: Scott Horton Interviews Christopher Ketcham
- 1.0 - “Potential to See More” Attacks on Pakistan
- 1.0 - The Bloom Is Off the Housing Rose
- 1.0 - Judgment Is More Important Than Experience
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Also Propping This Article
MidnightPrism
Helixbuilder
berkeley
Ratskii
TGrass3001
not2needy
dan-and-jennifer
Neophile
STONERS
Aidenag
Groups Watching This
No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?




