Do No Evil

What do you think Wikipedia Should Do About Porn Content
This story has mostly positive ratings. 55 votes / No sinks

What do you think Wikipedia Should Do About Porn Content

Do No Evil – In an article at World Net Daily posted only two days ago you can read some shocking news: FBI investigates the Wikimedia foundation as a result of reports about the presence of questionable material (with serious, explicit sexual content) present on Wikipedia.

Tags: pornography, wikimedia, wikipedia, featured

Report

Filter Comments ›
1 - 14 of 14 Comments by 10 members  RSS Feed for comments

1

Add Comment
avatar
Reply

A warning before accessing such places would be good .

Removing such content is not a good idea .

avatar
Reply

I agree with the warning, but is Wikipedia really the right place for pornography?

avatar
Reply

I actually agree with both statements . But , wouldn't that be a freedom of speech issue ?

avatar
Reply

Not as long as the people at Wikipedia remove it and it's not the government insisting they do it. It's their site, they have no obligation to allow/disallow porn on it. It's their choice.

avatar
Reply

Actually the FBI is deep in this issue right now. Something to do with pedophilia and images related to this issues present at the Wikipedia. I think that the American government will insist that the Wikipedia disallows questionable content in the future.

avatar
Reply

Basically here's my idea we can solve this by doing a simple one-word action: NOTHING. Say it with me now n-o-t-h-i-n-g. You can't censor wikipedia just because it's becoming a bad role model, and besides there are worse things than porn that can happen to your kids. At MOST a content filter might be appropriate, but I highly disagree with the sensationalist nature of this article. I think the person who wrote it was pulling a bit of a Maude Flanders, albeit with a little more sense and less zionist, but I still detect it there in the diction, which was as mentioned already, sensationalist.

avatar
Reply

"there are worse things than porn that can happen to your kids. At MOST a content filter might be appropriate"

That decision should be up to the parents

As long as there is a way to prevent kids from getting to the porn entries, Wikipedia should make the decision

avatar
Reply

So basically you are saying that parents should block wikipedia.org with the children safety software. Wouldn't that be detrimental for the rest of the content at Wikipedia?

avatar
Reply

I don't think that parents should block kids and I also feel that removing all pictures that people feel offensive is not right either.

I am not saying that pornography is right but with what is shown on television and in movies today Wikipeadia is the least of our worries, and for those kids who are looking for porn I doubt that this will be their first choice.

There are many things in life which can shock children and some of them happen right in peoples homes and in school or on the street, our job as parents is to prepare them for this or explain it to them if they witness something that shocks them.

avatar
Reply

You don't have kids, do you?

avatar
Reply

PsychoHosebeast- Yep I have five of them, there are four boys and one girl and range in age from 16 thru to 28. We never really worried about porn, it was a subject that we discussed with our children as the need arose, with the boys it wasn't a big problem but when our daughter came home from babysitting once and said about 14 year old boys watching porn the explaining got a little difficult. Mom did a pretty good job explaining it to her. Being on a farm kids are exposed to acts of sex between animals at an early age and I think that by even 8 years old all of our children understood what sex was.

avatar
Reply

One thing is to understand what sex is and a completely other is to expose kids to pornography. Some of the images at the Wikipedia, which is general content rated, should be X-rated and treated as such, but they are not. Most of them I suppose are submitted by the same person, as they look like treating the same topic (gay-porn). They are hardcore images, not just "erotica" - you should really go check them out. I bet you will not want your children exposed to such images, even at the age of 14!

avatar
Reply

Parents should monitor what their children do on the computer, especially on the internet. Stop blaming other people for your own lazyness.

avatar
Reply

Nobody is going to wikipedia to get their porn fix. The whole internet already exists for that. Your kids know more about porn than you do. You can't make it go away, you can teach your kids how to get out of bad situations and be aware of their surroundings. They will be adults before you know it, and they have to start living in the real world some time.

1

Add Comment

You must log in first to post a comment. Secure Signin

Not a member? Sign-up today!


Who voted on this story?

View all (55) »

Who sunk this story?

Channels
AnchorsArt & DesignAutos
BooksCareers & JobsCelebrities
Do No EvilDo-It-YourselfFamily
FoodGadgets & TechGay & Lesbian
Health & FitnessHumorLove & Personals
MenMoneyMovies
MusicNewsPets
PoliticsPopular VideosReal Estate
ReligionScienceShopping
SportsTelevisionTravel
VideoVideo GamesWomen