Lessons of the Quaternary [Debunking Global Warming] »
Posted by: libsRfunny 2 months, 4 weeks ago61 CommentsReflectReport this Story
One of the world's leading journals focusing on the geology, geomorphology, geography, archaeology, soil science, palaeobotany, palaeontology, and palaeoclimatology of the Quaternary Period ... titled Quaternary Science Reviews. Three articles have been published recently ... we are calling the "Lessons of the Quaternary."
Read Full Story at worldclimatereport.com
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 61
-
-
0%
jovial2 months, 4 weeks ago
this site: http://www.worldclimatereport.com
is run by these three people:
Chief Editor: Patrick J. Michaels
Contributing Editor: Robert E. Davis
Administrator: Paul C. Knappenberger
All three of whom were a part of the ICEE, an organization funded by Exxon. The three of them have been in many other organizations, too long to list here, which have all been funded by oil firms.
Would people who work for oil companies deceive us?
Reply
-
-
0%
libsRfunny2 months, 4 weeks ago
FTA
The first article of interest was generated by a team of scientists from Norway, Canada, and Russia and deals with glaciers in the northern Ural Mountains of Russia. Their shocking and revealing title is 'Glaciers in the Polar Urals, Russia, were not much larger during the Last Global Glacial Maximum than today.'
"Are they kidding â;; is this some kind of spoof? Every presentation on global warming insists that glaciers are retreating the world over..."
Reply-
0%
libsRfunny2 months, 4 weeks ago
FTA
"The plot is reconstructed sea surface temperatures from the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Guatemala for the past 32,000 years. If global warming is your thing, you really missed it â;; notice the 12°C warm-up from 15,000 years ago to 10,000 years ago. We see no warming at all during the Anthropocene; we also notice how much more variable the climate was during the cold periods, not the warm ones."
Reply-
0%
libsRfunny2 months, 4 weeks ago
FTA
"So while the climate alarmists warn us of upcoming severe droughts, the St. Jacques et al. team shows us that much bigger droughts have occurred in the past both in relatively cold and warm periods."
Well, damn, Al Gore and his disciples in the Church of Global Warming aren't going to like any of this!
Reply
-
-
-
0%
aniokly2 months, 4 weeks ago
The Global Warming crowd must blame everything that happens, droughts, tornadoes, floods, etc on Global Warming. In reality G W is a gigantic hoax perpetrated on people to bleed them of money. It is a revenue enhancer. There is no concensus, it is a theory, an unproven idea.
Have you purchased your carbon offsets yet? Me neither.
Reply-
0%
libsRfunny2 months, 4 weeks ago
I don't think it's so much about bleeding people as much as it is two things: One is to make Al Gore relevant as well as a few bucks through his "carbon credits" business/scam. He thought he was going to be president, but the people voted otherwise -- mo matter what the lefties think about Florida.
The other aspect is to economically hamstring the U.S. in particular, which since has been surpassed by China as the greatest contributor of CO2. Never mind that CO2 is a natural gas with about 97 percent of it occurring through the natural order.
And never mind that Al Gore was the U.S. representative at the Kyoto Conference and nixed the idea of having the U.S. sign on. Clinton agreed and refused to sign it.
Reply-
0%
HannibalBarca2 months, 4 weeks ago
Sorry, wrong again as usual it was shrub.!!!!
abandon Kyoto climate pact
Updated Thu. Mar. 29 2001 11:04 AM ET
U.S. President George W. Bush said Thursday he would work with Germany and other U.S. allies to devise a plan that will reduce global greenhouse gas emissions, but effectively rejected implementing the Kyoto agreement.
The Bush administration has said Congress wouldn't ratify the agreement and Bush himself says concerns over the slowing U.S. economy are paramount.
We'll be working with Germany, we'll be working with our allies to reduce greenhouse gases, but I will not accept anything that will harm our economy and hurt our American workers, Bush said at a news conference.
Reply
-
-
0%
hamy2 months, 4 weeks ago
"In reality G W is a gigantic hoax perpetrated on people to bleed them of money. It is a revenue enhancer."
What does that make the War in Iraq?
Reply
-
-
0%
Wolfie20072 months, 4 weeks ago
libs & ani
I have one other group to add to the list of those whom glow bull warming is important, the environmental commies who want to use this and/or any other pretext to steal your property rights.
Btw, Algore said he was gonna get you glow bull warmer deniers , aren't you scared yet? lol
Reply -
0%
spkguy2 months, 4 weeks ago
Writing in Harpers Magazine in 1995, author Ross Gelbspan noted that "Michaels has received more than $115,000 over the last four years from coal and energy interests. World Climate Review, a quarterly he founded that routinely debunks climate concerns, was funded by Western Fuels."
A furor was raised when it was revealed in 2006 that, at customer expense, Patrick Michaels was quietly paid $100,000 by an electric utility, Intermountain Rural Electric Association, which burns coal to help confuse the issue of global warming
Reply-
0%
spkguy2 months, 4 weeks ago
According to Harper's, Balling has recieved more than $200,000 from coal and oil interests over the past six years. Specific incidences include significant levels of funding since 1989 from the Kuwaiti government, foreign coal and mining corporations and Cyprus Minerals Company (totalling $72,554). (Kuwait has opposed the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). The Kuwaiti government paid for a release of Balling's "A Heated Debate" in the Middle East, a project originally funded by the Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy. The Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Science granted Balling $48,993 and the Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research granted him an undisclosed amount. British Coal Corporation gave him a total of $103,544 and the German Coal Mining Association gave him $81,780 in two separate grants. (Ozone Action, NCPPR directory)
Reply-
0%
pc252 months, 4 weeks ago
if you don't think there is tremendous money at stake for Global warming pundits here is one for you
http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/11/news/newsmakers...
Al Gore's next act: Planet-saving VC
The recovering politician is teaming with a legendary venture capitalist and bigtime moneyman to make over the $6 trillion global energy business.
Notice that's TRILLIONS with a T.......not a couple of hundred grand...........
Reply
-
-
0%
libsRfunny2 months, 4 weeks ago
"World Climate Review"
This is the "World Climate Report," not the "World Climate Review." See the difference?
I knew some bonehead would pull the entire "oil and coal shill" bs. The man is a bona fide climatologist and is citing peer-reviewed work done by others - many not even from this nation.
Too bad you didn't have anything relevant to say.
Reply-
0%
libsRfunny2 months, 4 weeks ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Michaels
Environmental Sciences at the University of Virginia . He is a former university Climatologist for Virginia , a position he held from 1980 until his resignation in 2007. His professional specialty was the influence of climate on agriculture . In interviews Michaels has said that he does not contest the basic scientific principles behind greenhouse warming and acknowledges that global mean temperature has increased in recent decades, though he is widely regarded in the media as a global warming skeptic who contends that the changes will be minor, not catastrophic, and even beneficial in many cases."
Reply
-
-
-
0%
hamy2 months, 4 weeks ago
Once again, it is more important to you to divide the country into "us" and "them" regarding this issue rather than try to find some common ground on the issue itself. You would rather attack someone who doesn't feel the same as you. Sad.
It just goes to show a perfect example of what Rove's politics have done to our nation.
You are on the same team, idiot, as the rest of us. We are all Americans. What one does, we all do.
Reply-
0%
hamy2 months, 4 weeks ago
OK. So I guess that Cactus, Libs, Covalent and Klarissa are no longer Americans since they don't feel that we are all on the same side.
I prefer to think that as a UNITED nation, we would prevail in all of our endeavors. But as a DIVIDED nation, as we are now (more divided than during the civil war by some polls) we will surely fail as we have during this administration.
We must come together. Although without these four people who feel that they must secede.
Reply-
0%
libsRfunny2 months, 4 weeks ago
"We must come together. Although without these four people who feel that they must secede."
What a completely moronic statement. Suddenly, people who don't agree with you are "no longer Americans." That's about as intolerant as you can get. I'm just being a "patriot" and exercising free speech based on sound science.
A nation more divided than during the Civil War?!! Seek help. You need it.... BADLY! LOL
Reply -
0%
Klarissa2 months, 4 weeks ago
We do not have to come together. But, we do have to talk to each other and hope that we can agree to disagree on some things and agree on others.
I am most disturbed with those who would make us a United World by taxing us and distributing it around the world in a program that makes people dependent on us. Give women birth control(voluntary) along with food, then we will see some advances.
Reply
-
Submitted By:
libsRfunny
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Also Propping This Article
Helixbuilder
stephen-johnson- ningyo
BronxBomber- ronron
RedRiverJ- crghss
simonsez
jumpmaster
Klarissa
Groups Watching This
No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?
